If it is worth doing, it is worth overdoing. Right?
I was getting what almost seemed to be erratic readings with the dial test indicator trying to measure the runout on the KBC arbor (1-507-305). So I marked the spindle pulley in 8 roughly equal segments. On the clock, that would be 12:00, 1:30, 3:00, 4:30, etc.
On the arbor, I noticed that readings near the big end of the jacobs taper seemed to be very different from those near the small end. So I marked an arbitrary spot near the big end, near the small end and roughly in the middle. I used a "Verdict" dial test indicator marked in 0.0005 graduations and interpolated to the nearest 0.0025.
I did 3 sets of measurements removing the arbor and reinstalling it before each set.
My measurements are in the attached pdf. BTW, I have a crappy fine adjust on the mag base so in the raw data if I got the starting point (12:00) within 1 thou, I would start the measurements from there. What matters is the increase or decease in the value as I rotated the spindle. If the arbor was perfect, it would never change from the starting value. I also recorded the measurement when I got back to 12:00 as a sanity check--if I was within 1/2 thou of the starting measurement, I figured I hadn't screwed up too badly.
I was surprised at how much variation there was between trials. I thought that R8 tapers would seat in a very repeatable fashion. Trial 1 and Trial 3 are pretty similar. Maybe I screwed up something in Trial 2--not sure.
Nonetheless, the measurements showed that the arbor is a fine approximation of a potato: lumpy!! Especially the big half of the taper. Hills and valleys. More than 3 thous of variation from the low spots to the high spots.
Anyway, I've returned the arbor to KBC. The guy at the counter asked a few questions to be sure he understood my measurements and then refunded my money with no hassle.
And I was wrong about the homemade arbor (R8 to JT6). I did a quick test on it and the runout exceeded the 10 thou range of the DTI I was using!!
Craig