• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

Starrett vs Mitutoyo

thestelster

Ultra Member
Premium Member
Well not an exhaustive comparison but....

Last year I picked up 3 used Mitutoyo micrometers at a fantastic price. When I took a closer look at them, I was a little disappointed, not their accuracy (I havent checked them yet), but in their build quality.

They all have holes in the frame, carbide faces, and the anvil and spindle measure 0.250", and all have a plastic logo which looks to be glued in place. All made in Japan.

The 4-5" is all metal and engraved numbers and lines on the sleeve and thimble.:)

The 3-4" is all metal except for the lock lever which is plastic. And the numbers and lines are painted? on.:(

The 2-3" has plastic lock lever, plastic ratchet stop, and painted numbers.:(:(

So it seems tha these were all made in different years.

In contrast, the Starrett's have a solid frame, the spindle and anvil are 0.270" in diameter and do not have carbide faces (though they do offer them with carbide). All metal; all the numbers and lines are real engraving, and the logo is integral with the frame and engraved too. These were made in Great Britain, (Jedburgh, Scotland).

Needless to say, I prefer the Starrett's. But from what I understand, their quality has taken a bit of a dive over the last decade, and some of their current products are made in China.
 

Attachments

  • 20240103_111449.jpg
    20240103_111449.jpg
    880.1 KB · Views: 12
  • 20240103_111014.jpg
    20240103_111014.jpg
    681.7 KB · Views: 12
Ya, the old rules of thumb regarding western vs eastern quality seems to be changing. Maybe another good reason to look for older second hand western tools that were built to a higher standard. I do not like the Mitutoyo shift to more plastic parts at all. Altho my sense is that eastern stuff is catching up in quality my eastern micrometers are so crappy I do not consider them useable.
 
All my MIT stuff has been top-drawer quality. With the painted on numbers, I fear a clone or counterfeit. I wish it weren't so, but there's a lot of clone stuff out there...

I bought a Mit micrometer 0-1" last year, and I love it. better than anything I've owned, and miles ahead of my Moore and Wright mics.
 
All my MIT stuff has been top-drawer quality. With the painted on numbers, I fear a clone or counterfeit. I wish it weren't so, but there's a lot of clone stuff out there...

I bought a Mit micrometer 0-1" last year, and I love it. better than anything I've owned, and miles ahead of my Moore and Wright mics.
I just checked the current Mitutoyo catalogue, and it states that their micrometers, series #101, #102, #103, are laser etched, and in the photos they all have the plastic ratchet stop.

But, I have an older Mit model series 101, which is definitely engraved, and all metal, and beautifully made.
 

Attachments

  • 20240104_092241.jpg
    20240104_092241.jpg
    370.8 KB · Views: 5
I recently purchased Mititoyo Digital Mic Accurate to 0.0001. Yes it has plastic and a plastic lock, but......

The friction set is just amazing with it's repeatability (I've always had a preference to click types). The rest of the plastic is well place and when you think about it the purpose makes sense. Keeping heat out of the frame which eliminates heat induced expansion which effects repeatability.

So is this cheaping out? Or does this truly improve the product?

IMHO its the later. I think we sometimes need to see the forest beyond the trees.
 
Complaining about holes....they are to lighten the frame without reducing structural strength, which intern helps with reduce of frame deflection under its own mass thereby improving accuracy.

 
Back
Top