• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

measuring a tapered stub

mjautek

Active Member
so I have this Lorch LLN lathe that I'm trying to tool up, and I wanted to make a new drill chuck arbour for it for a keyless chuck I recently bought. problem is, the tailstock taper is non-standard (non morse, and also like a half length) and there's no spec I can find for it (this lathe doesn't even have an entry on lathes.co.uk) so I had to measure it myself.

1732935183855.png


I guess the smart thing to do would be to measure the tailstock bore directly - with two balls of appropriate size and a depth mic one can determine the taper. unfortunately I don't have the right size balls, so I opted to measure the male taper angle off of some dead centers instead.

1. optical comparator
first method was to try using the protractor screen on the optical comparator. at first I tried to align the dead center/vee block to the crosshairs and measure the half angle with the protractor; but really the better option way was to measure one side and move the stage over to measure the other side and add the angles. with this method I got something like 2°, but I didn't feel super confident that this (not better than +/- 3-4')

1732935232516.png


2. dogmeat cmm using the mill
I guess this was kind of an excuse to use the optical rotary table since I have one and never use it. sweep back and forth on the X axis of the mill and fiddle with the rotary table until the indicator stays still. here the half angle seems to be 1°3'. again the setup is pretty cheesy (rotab is not clamped to table lol, vee block is held to the rotab using a magnet) so again I'm not super confident in the results - though measuring both dead centers and checking zero with a dowel pin implies that this method is at least consistent.

1732935273533.png


1732935302404.png



I'm sure there's even more ways to skin this cat (I also have a surface plate and a set of inspection room angle blocks... and then there's the cmm at work) but this is probably good enough for me to go off of (probably gonna try to make it on the cnc lathe at work).

so? my guess is it's 2° included angle since it's a round number - and also schaublin uses a 2° tailstock taper on some of their smaller lathes so it seems reasonable...
 
hold it between centers on the lathe, use a dial indicator setup on the centerline to measure the change in diameter at 2 locations a known distance apart? Do math, get answer maybe?
But finding an excuse to dig out little used tools is always fun.
 
My suggestion would be to make it on a manual lathe and use the old one to set the compound with a dial indicator you don't even need to know what the actual angle is. Just have to find a creative way of holding the original piece straight in the lathe. Having said that your ways are probably much better and more accurate but I don't have any of those fancy tools so this is how I would have to do it.
 
I wonder if it is 1:25? (2.08* or 2*5’)

Here is an excerpt form a watchmaker’s forum where they discuss tapers.

IMG_2825.jpeg


And here is the link to said thread.

 
Assuming that your two dead centers fit (I'd use Prussian blue to test fit them to make sure), then I'm in the camp that says to duplicate them using one of the two as a master as described by @Megar arc 5040dd above. This takes an accurate measurement out of the equation.

Then test fit the new taper with Blue too.

Hard to believe it isn't a standard taper of some kind though.
 
My suggestion would be to make it on a manual lathe and use the old one to set the compound with a dial indicator you don't even need to know what the actual angle is. Just have to find a creative way of holding the original piece straight in the lathe. Having said that your ways are probably much better and more accurate but I don't have any of those fancy tools so this is how I would have to do it.
guess I should have mentioned that I've done this before but the point was to get an actual measurement...

hold it between centers on the lathe, use a dial indicator setup on the centerline to measure the change in diameter at 2 locations a known distance apart? Do math, get answer maybe?
But finding an excuse to dig out little used tools is always fun.
thought about this too but the tailstock alignment on all of my lathes is suspect haha

I wonder if it is 1:25? (2.08* or 2*5’)

Here is an excerpt form a watchmaker’s forum where they discuss tapers.
oh? this is very interesting... 2°5' is very close to the half angle I was getting... thanks!
 
Assuming that your two dead centers fit (I'd use Prussian blue to test fit them to make sure), then I'm in the camp that says to duplicate them using one of the two as a master as described by @Megar arc 5040dd above. This takes an accurate measurement out of the equation.

Then test fit the new taper with Blue too.

Hard to believe it isn't a standard taper of some kind though.
If it actually is 1:25, it would be a standard, just not one we normally encounter.
 
Best way to measure it (at least with what that I have, no CMM here) is a sine bar on the surface plate. There are lots of tapers and some are really close. Clamp the parallel section in a v block and set it on the sine bar and indicate

I also think Robin nailed it - that guy Dushan is credible imo.
 
Back
Top