The lathe I purchased from Modern (C0636A -- same lathe as @Janger) has a variety of speeds in either a high/low range.
The 'posted' speeds in low range (in order of speed) are: 70/115/190/300
In high range the speeds posted are 460/755/1255/2000
Some time back I had a weak moment while browsing ebay/amazon/kbc/princess-auto flyers and bought one of those laser speed readers. I must say that after I pressed the purchase button, i felt buyers remorse..... until it showed up. I use that device all the time now, on anything from motors, fans, pulleys etc.
Anyhow, I put some reflect tape on the 3-jaw and ran it in all speed ranges to see what the laser says.
In high range, all the speeds 'labelled' on the machine are 'over' stated by 15.5 - 16%. All the speeds in the low range are 'under' stated by 15.5 - 17%.
Example: Highest posted speed: 2000, laser reading 1680. Lowest low speed: 70, laster reading 82.
I found it interesting that there was uniformity to it --- it wasn't just one gear range that was off -- it was consistent. And the inverse proportion between high/low was interesting too.
The tech from Modern had said that all the motors had been replaced/swapped on these machines due to issues in the quality with the batch. If a different sized pulley were used, could that account for the offset? Perhaps the 'increased bore' size over the original design from 1.5" to 2"
Ok, now for the question: Comments/theories on the findings? Is this typical? Has anyone else ever tested their speeds? @Janger -- I'd interested to see what your lathe does as it is the same model.
The 'posted' speeds in low range (in order of speed) are: 70/115/190/300
In high range the speeds posted are 460/755/1255/2000
Some time back I had a weak moment while browsing ebay/amazon/kbc/princess-auto flyers and bought one of those laser speed readers. I must say that after I pressed the purchase button, i felt buyers remorse..... until it showed up. I use that device all the time now, on anything from motors, fans, pulleys etc.
Anyhow, I put some reflect tape on the 3-jaw and ran it in all speed ranges to see what the laser says.
In high range, all the speeds 'labelled' on the machine are 'over' stated by 15.5 - 16%. All the speeds in the low range are 'under' stated by 15.5 - 17%.
Example: Highest posted speed: 2000, laser reading 1680. Lowest low speed: 70, laster reading 82.
I found it interesting that there was uniformity to it --- it wasn't just one gear range that was off -- it was consistent. And the inverse proportion between high/low was interesting too.
The tech from Modern had said that all the motors had been replaced/swapped on these machines due to issues in the quality with the batch. If a different sized pulley were used, could that account for the offset? Perhaps the 'increased bore' size over the original design from 1.5" to 2"
Ok, now for the question: Comments/theories on the findings? Is this typical? Has anyone else ever tested their speeds? @Janger -- I'd interested to see what your lathe does as it is the same model.