• Scam Alert. Members are reminded to NOT send money to buy anything. Don't buy things remote and have it shipped - go get it yourself, pay in person, and take your equipment with you. Scammers have burned people on this forum. Urgency, secrecy, excuses, selling for friend, newish members, FUD, are RED FLAGS. A video conference call is not adequate assurance. Face to face interactions are required. Please report suspicions to the forum admins. Stay Safe - anyone can get scammed.

Gear Hob Mandrel

Susquatch

Ultra Member
Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Wondering why Gear Hob Mandrels have so many collars, washers, and sleeves.

Screenshot_20211120-165810_Amazon Shopping.jpg


Why isn't it as simple as mounting a cutter on a key between one collar and a nut and go?
 
Those aren't hobs, they're form cutters and the mandrel is a standard one - different spacers so different thicknesses of cutters can be used. (although the manufacturer is rather optimistic given its R8 :D )
 
Ok. I've only called them hobs cuz that's what I always thought they were called. Learned something new again.

So what does a gear hob look like?

If you think that is optimistic, my old MT3 shank for my own old hobs (sorry, I meant "Form Cutters") looks exactly the same! I have some fat and some skinny form cutters. All the extra sleeves, collars, and bushings live unused in the drawer. Still don't see why more than a nut and lock nut would be needed......
 
9263B7B5-9506-4D98-9350-5B1B74F53FD5.webp


@Susquatch: see above


Using the arbor with the spacers you can move the cutter up and down depending on need to provide clearance, you can use two slitting saws spaced out, larger body cutters - the hob for example.

Always good to have options
 
a hob has the rack form of the tooth wrapped around itself in a helix.....the hob and the work but rotate and are synchronized. What I meant by optimistic was the manufacture making it so long - I mean its not like on an R8 arbore you're going to have much luck using a cutter the whole length of that arbor. Was just cracking off about the maker, It'll work fine for your cutters...sorry if I confused things


this shows it pretty well


.
 
Never mind my question about a hobb.

I found this on line:

Gear Hobbing​

Gear hobbing is the process of generating gear teeth with a helical cutting tool, or hob. The gear blank and hob rotate continuously until all gear teeth are cut into the blank. The speed of this process makes it ideal for large production runs.

Gear Milling​

The gear milling process uses a cutter, known as a form cutter, that moves axially to produce a gear tooth at the proper length and depth. After one tooth is cut, the cutter is withdrawn to allow the gear blank to rotate to the next position. Once the blank is rotated, the form cutter cuts the next tooth, and this process continues until all teeth are cut into the blank. This process is slower, making it a low production process.
 
Hahaha..... I see both of you replied while I was drafting the above. Sorry about that.

Ya, thanks @Brent H. That does make sense. I can see how clearance could be an issue up close to the spindle nose, and perhaps at the other end too!
 
a hob has the rack form of the tooth wrapped around itself in a helix.....the hob and the work but rotate and are synchronized. What I meant by optimistic was the manufacture making it so long - I mean its not like on an R8 arbore you're going to have much luck using a cutter the whole length of that arbor. Was just cracking off about the maker, It'll work fine for your cutters...sorry if I confused things


this shows it pretty well


.

Good explanation.

Guess I never hobbed a gear after all. I only form cut one....... (insert pout face here).

No biggie. One tooth at a time is fine for me.

No worries on the R8 confusion. I like my R8 Spindle. I'm REALLY impressed by what an R8 on my bigger mills can do.
 
I like my R8 as well....but I wouldn't run a 2" wide horizontal mill cutting in it :)

I did try a BIG 50 thou side milling cut on my R8 Mill at 5Hz just to evaluate VFD low speed torque. I dunno what 2" would do but 1" worked just fine. I'm guessing 2" with a little more speed would work just fine.

Here you go Brent. 50 thou at 5hz side milling 1 inch thick mild steel was zero problem.

The top of the attached photo was cut at 5 hz on the back gear, the rest was cut at 5hz in direct drive.

No way did that even load the motor let alone stall it. The only difference is the finish - plainly visible in the photo - as my discussion above suggested it probably would be.

Again, it's a cool insight into the material properties and mill function. And it's amazing to watch that end mill peeling off thread after thread of steel at the speed of smell.

View attachment 17792

The one lonely line just below the back gear cut is when I stopped cutting to get a better continuous grip on the hand wheel.
 
Those arbors come in different lengths & spacer kits BTW, you're not just stuck with that one. I guess short is generally preferred just from rigidity & runout reduction standpoint, but there may be times when the part/setup requires a longer arbor. Having a selection helps keep the bank account lean & trim. :)

And just to add to confusion, there are arbors conspicuously like this sold as slitting saw / jeweler saw holders which may or may not be? Often times I wonder if some of these offshore places even know what they are selling or just leave it to you figure. Some still have a key but not all blades have a key slot & also the hole dimension can vary, particularly vs. N-Am blades. With these, you might have to reverse the process - examine the nominal dimensions of blades & see what arbors(s) fit. It can be a bit of money pit depending on what path you go down. Now what I'm finding is there is a whole world of metric slitting saws out there (but which necessitates matching tooling).
 
Those arbors come in different lengths & spacer kits BTW, you're not just stuck with that one. I guess short is generally preferred just from rigidity & runout reduction standpoint, but there may be times when the part/setup requires a longer arbor. Having a selection helps keep the bank account lean & trim. :)

And just to add to confusion, there are arbors conspicuously like this sold as slitting saw / jeweler saw holders which may or may not be? Often times I wonder if some of these offshore places even know what they are selling or just leave it to you figure. Some still have a key but not all blades have a key slot & also the hole dimension can vary, particularly vs. N-Am blades. With these, you might have to reverse the process - examine the nominal dimensions of blades & see what arbors(s) fit. It can be a bit of money pit depending on what path you go down. Now what I'm finding is there is a whole world of metric slitting saws out there (but which necessitates matching tooling).

I hear you. Your explanation of all the bits on the arbor matches what @Brent H said. That makes sense to me.

But I'll probably be dead before I need a metric slit saw...... LOL!
 
Well, maybe. The way I look at it is if all I need is 'a slit' of a +/- nominal size, then I'm impartial as to IMP vs MET. Thus far my slits don't have to mate anything of critical dimension. So whether its 1/16" or 1.5mm usually doesn't affect the part. But if one can get good quality metric tooling for same or lower price than N-Am, then the Hobby Buy-O-Matic needle starts to drift that way. My experience on domestic saws is the stuff from Europe is decent, but the stuff from India is crap. For example KBC carries some from Poland & eastern block Europe. The problem is, the next nominal size may be sourced elsewhere. Then you hop to Ali & see metric equivalents for less $ or even carbide for the price of HSS here. Whether the quality is there or not is the same old story - who knows. For example my carbide threading inserts/tools are clones of Carmex but at about 1/3 price. For my purposes they work great. I've switched over to metric parting tools/inserts for the same reason. Often times the domestic tool catalogs are cagey - they might list a width as X/64" but really all they are doing is converting mm.
 
Well, maybe. The way I look at it is if all I need is 'a slit' of a +/- nominal size, then I'm impartial as to IMP vs MET. Thus far my slits don't have to mate anything of critical dimension. So whether its 1/16" or 1.5mm usually doesn't affect the part. But if one can get good quality metric tooling for same or lower price than N-Am, then the Hobby Buy-O-Matic needle starts to drift that way. My experience on domestic saws is the stuff from Europe is decent, but the stuff from India is crap. For example KBC carries some from Poland & eastern block Europe. The problem is, the next nominal size may be sourced elsewhere. Then you hop to Ali & see metric equivalents for less $ or even carbide for the price of HSS here. Whether the quality is there or not is the same old story - who knows. For example my carbide threading inserts/tools are clones of Carmex but at about 1/3 price. For my purposes they work great. I've switched over to metric parting tools/inserts for the same reason. Often times the domestic tool catalogs are cagey - they might list a width as X/64" but really all they are doing is converting mm.

Agreed on all counts.
 
I like my R8 as well....but I wouldn't run a 2" wide horizontal mill cutting in it :)

So, I was straightening a big bracket on my 30 ton shop press and I noticed that one of my big steel reaction blocks was badly out of square.

Hmmmmm says I! Nice chance to checkout 2" side milling on the Hartford. Actually it turned out to be 2-1/2 inches. Perfect job for my big 3" x 3/4" end mill.

Chucked it up and had at it. Took 5 passes at 20 thou to get it square and one pass at 30 thou to try and make it complain.

So this is 30 thou over 2.5 inches at just 5Hz on the VFD. It didn't whimper at all. Just got down to business and cut like butter.

20211121_135826.jpg
 
So, I was straightening a big bracket on my 30 ton shop press and I noticed that one of my big steel reaction blocks was badly out of square.

Hmmmmm says I! Nice chance to checkout 2" side milling on the Hartford. Actually it turned out to be 2-1/2 inches. Perfect job for my big 3" x 3/4" end mill.

Chucked it up and had at it. Took 5 passes at 20 thou to get it square and one pass at 30 thou to try and make it complain.

So this is 30 thou over 2.5 inches at just 5Hz on the VFD. It didn't whimper at all. Just got down to business and cut like butter.

View attachment 18439

Chucked it up?
 
Chucked it up?

Ya sorry, nothing fancy, just my own shop slang for:

"I stuck a 3/4x3 inch four flute spiral end mill into a 3/4 inch R8 Collet, then shoved that assembly up the spindle, and then torqued up the draw bar."
 
In case you are wondering, "Shifs" is code for low moisture content body waste. Gotta watch out for the forum security team.
 
Ya sorry, nothing fancy, just my own shop slang for:

"I stuck a 3/4x3 inch four flute spiral end mill into a 3/4 inch R8 Collet, then shoved that assembly up the spindle, and then torqued up the draw bar."

Ok, chucked up works. I thought you were talking about the 1-1/2" thick steel reaction block:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top