When I think about an internal combustion engine, I still marvel that it was ever mass produced or the fact that they are still in use in such huge numbers, especially when compared to the elegance and simplicity of an electric motor. Obviously the amount of energy in a litre of gas has a lot to do with it.
I think you have been into the coolaide...... LOL!
But seriously, you are absolutely right about energy density. However you are probably underestimating the difference. Even with the latest batteries, liquid fuels store 75x more energy per unit of weight. So it's not just a little amount of energy difference. Factor in that horrible IC combustion efficiency and your still at 35:1.
Gasoline is the energy density king of the hill at 50 MJ/kg or 35MJ/L. The best batteries of today are only 350 Wh/kg and state of the art is double that but not yet commercialized. For comparison, 350Wh = 1.25 MJ
With the umpteen speed transmissions, VVT etc. etc. I think they have rung about as much as they can out of an inherently inefficient design and for city commuters makes little sense at this point. I'm really looking forward to an electric car for city use, 95% of the time my trips are < 20km.
Gasoline has been around forever, yet improvements continue to roll out. The mistake most governments and the media make when they compare gasoline to batteries is to use projections for battery energy density improvements, but assume gasoline won't advance any more than it already has. Yet it does for the very reasons you mention and a thousand more.
For city use like you think you will experience, an EV might make good sense. At least for now. It might be a different story when everyone in the city plugs in their EV at the same time each evening.
And of course, I'm still waiting for a level playing field. EVs are subsidized right now while ICs are taxed. That's of course to increase sales ratio of EVs. When that goes away, it will be an interesting study of human behaviour. When the US & Canada considered removing the subsidies, the EV industry went nuts saying it wasn't fair cuz it would kill them.
IMHO, the judgement is in the hands of buyers. I was once asked at a conference why minivans were so popular when they cost 2x as much and usually only carry one passenger. The answer is "convenience". Consumers love convenience. They could buy an economy car for 95% of their driving but they want that minivan for the 5% of the time they need it. Unless they can afford a gas car and an EV, most buyers will get the gas car cuz they can fill up in 5 minutes at any of hundreds of stations along their trip from anywhere to anywhere.
An all electric fleet might make good sense to a bureaucrat in Ottawa by 2035, but I've seen mandates like that come and go throughout my life. You can't just pass a law to make the sky turn green. Convenience is still king in the market and I bet it stays that way for the rest of my life anyway.
I've said this on here before and I'll say it here again. The dark horse in the room isn't EVs. It is plantoline. High energy density liquid HCs extracted directly from bio-engineered plants. Truly Green Affordable Convenience. It's in the works now so maybe I'll even drive one before I die. THAT would be SO COOL!